Blogathons

The Alfred Hitchcock Blogathon: Marnie (1964)

The Hitchcock Blogathon 4

This is my second entry for my Hitchcock blogathon. This time I’m writing about Marnie. This is one of Hitch’s later films, and it is one which I think really deserves to be better known and appreciated by audiences today.

This one hasn’t been as well received by audiences as the vast majority of Hitch’s other films were. I think that was because this isn’t really your typical Hitchcock film. Marnie explores problems of the mind, and it’s far from the usual suspense/thriller films audiences had come to expect. 

This is the second and final Hitchcock film to star Tippi Hedren. She was excellent in The Birds, but I really think she outdoes herself in Marnie. Tippi lets us see that this woman is truly messed up (both emotionally and psychologically)she really makes you feel and believe that Marnie has some major issues in her life that have left her emotionally scarred. In the scenes where Marnie is scared of something, Tippi looks truly petrified and traumatised.

This is an interesting film as most of the suspense lies in unlocking the secrets hidden within Marnie herself. There are some other suspenseful moments (such as the shoe dropping on the floor etc)but it is mainly Marnie’s psychological issues which keep us on the edge of our seats throughout.

This film has become famous for the scene where it is strongly implied that Mark rapes Marnie on their wedding night onboard the passenger ship. This sequence caused friction between Hitch and the original scriptwriter Evan Hunter . When Hunter left the project, the script was written again, and this time around by a woman! Jay Presson Allen, who had no trouble in writing that scene, or in writing it the way Hitch wanted it to be.

The sequence as it stands is shocking, but we don’t actually see the act of rape take place, so to be fair we don’t actually know for sure if that is what happens to her as we don’t see anything. The way it’s cut together though does strongly suggest that was what took place. I’ll come back to this sequence later.

Margaret “Marnie Edgar (Tippi Hedren)is a compulsive thief who is on the run after robbing her employer of $10,000. Getting another job as a secretary at Rutland’s Publishing Company, Marnie attracts the attention of its widower owner Mark Rutland (Sean Connery). Unbeknown to Marnie, Mark saw her at the previous company she just robbed and keeps a close eye on her.

Marnie robs Mark’s firm. This time though she is caught by him. Mark blackmails her into marrying him in return for his silence. Marnie agrees and Mark tries to unlock the many mysteries that surround this woman.

Marnie hates being touched, is repulsed by the idea of sex, has panic attacks when she sees the colour red, and freaks out during thunderstorms. Mark slowly begins to uncover the horrific events in Marnie’s past that have caused her to become the woman she is now.

Photo0131

Sean plays a pretty unique character for a Hitchcock film, in that he appears to be pretty much unlikable. At first glance there is an air about him that makes it appear that he is studying Marnie, and at times it looks like he gets a kick out of forcing her to work on her issues. Marnie herself says to him “I’m just something you’ve caught!”

Having said that though, I’ve often wondered if he appears like that to us because we see him from Marnie’s point of view? Her perception of him may well be warped by her issues and how she is so wary of men and sees them all as things to be avoided and not trusted. Going back and viewing the film with that possibility in mind makes it more interesting I think.

It even makes you go back and think again about that suggested rape sequence, should that sequence actually be taken at face value? Was Mark actually doing nothing more than being a husband making love to his new wife, but due to how damaged she is, to her the act of making love seemed like rape to her? It also makes you think if he was a genuinely horrible person, why is he even trying to help Marnie at all with her issues? If he was so bad why would he care about her at all? Towards the end we see that he does care about her and she comes to trust him and values his help.

Mark also seems to care more for animals than he does people, and he talks about slowly gaining an animals trust. Throughout the film he uses the same techniques with Marnie, he is patient with her and allows her to come to him over time.

Tippi and Sean are both excellent.  There’s strong support from Diane Baker as Mark’s trouble making sister in law, Lil. She openly flirts with Mark, and it’s obvious she is jealous of Marnie when Mark brings her home.

Louise Latham plays Marnie’s mother. At first she is a typical Hitch mother, cold, distant, seemingly responsible for messing up her child etc. As the film goes on though we see her in a very different light. Louise is excellent particularly in the scenes when the truth about what happened to Marnie is revealed.  

Mariette Hartley plays Susan, a fellow secretary at Rutland’s who befriends Marnie. She is only in a few scenes but steals each one she is in. I love her amusement over her boss constantly forgetting the safe combination.

There’s also a small appearance by Bruce Dern, as a violent sailor who causes problems for Marnie and her mother.

Those watching this and expecting a typical Hitch film will be surprised. This film is quite unlike his others. I think the negative response to this one is a real shame, as the film is very good and has many memorable moments. The performances from the entire cast are also solid throughout.

My favourite scenes are the following. Marnie and Mark playing the word association game. Marnie dropping the shoe. Marnie freaking out over the red ink. Marnie and Lil meeting for the first time over tea. Mark telling Marnie he trained Sophie (a wild animal)to trust him. Marnie trying to get the gun off Mark. The final sequence when we learn all about what happened to Marnie.

What are your thoughts on this film? Please leave your comments below.

 

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “The Alfred Hitchcock Blogathon: Marnie (1964)”

  1. While it’s not one of my favorite Hitchcock films, Marnie does have its moments. Viewing it again, I appreciated it in a different light than I did the first few times. It’s an interesting but, to me, decidedly lesser Hitchcock movie. To each his own, I guess!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I watched Marnie last year for only the second time and liked it quite a bit more than I did the first. The cod psychology is just too pat, and it lets us know more about Hitchcock than I think we really want to, but it’s fascinating all the same. I like that at a Q&A Hitch was asked if the distorted view of the ship in the final scene reflected Marnie’s tortured mind, and he said “No, we just had a lousy scene painter!”

    It’s an interesting set of films you’ve chosen to write about. None are really among the best known Hitchcocks, they’re all fairly atypical films, and they all involve a slightly twisted male-female relationship, especially Marnie and Shadow of a Doubt. Are these your favourite Hitchcocks or ones you thought should be better known?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hi Jay. Shadow Of A Doubt is certainly a major favourite of mine. The other two I like and see a bit more in them than the majority of people who watch Hitch’s films seem to. I think Marnie and Sabotage deserve to be much better known/appreciated by audiences today. I disagree that Shadow of a Doubt is not well known, it’s one of his most famous films!

      Like

      1. It’s well known to people who are interested in films, but I was thinking more of the wider audience. I don’t think it’s as famous as Psycho, Vertigo, Rear Window, North by Northwest, The Birds, etc

        Like

  3. Interesting review. I still have to watch this one, and it is only a few of Hitchcock’s that I haven’t seen, but you have persuaded me. I cannot wait for the blogathon to officially start, it is exciting!

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I really like the scene in which Marnie freaks out over the red ink. And I agree that Tippi Hedren outdoes herself in this film. She is very good, and Marnie is really a movie that deserves more praise. Great review.
    Thanks for hosting this event!
    Kisses!
    Le

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s